Jump to content
  • Hardly Famous

    Magician 19@nodkeem

    Philosophical Model 19@nodkeem

    The Art Colony and related sites are just a modern day book with photos

    please share our address here with others as a book

    and its a book by donation mostly yet we sell subscriptions to forums

    other wise its free to view and listen to the music

     

     

     

     

    signatrure0999123456789.jpg

  • REPRESSION is COMMUNISM! BODY AUTONOMY for ALL

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Communist_repression

     

  • 226318120_23847857240430382_8268526558249737630_n (1).jpg

     

    In service to a great nation, I gave nearly my all. My soul for God and Country! Your Psychological Warrior for the war effort. MK-Donald/donna

  • While there are eternal truths such as gravity exists but why? (theory/model/faith) yet life is a series of half-truths that create an understanding or an illusion of preference  for each of us when added up making what some call that faith theory or modeling.

  • My personal opinion is that I am HALF right, and you are HALF wrong.
    DKMeek the Magician 19@nodkeem

  •  perhaps we are all conservatives yet we take the things that are offbeat and outcast at times and propose a better life that is more inclusive of the individuals in a society that is the liberal way

UNE a philosophical model


Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

Une not One an philosophical model

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

1:06 PM

Abstract atomic  math 101

A probable base eight system with 2 Une"s which are 2 to infinity  and 2 from infinity

I say probable due to the unknown if you can figure what base this is please let me know.

The infinite inside and outside makes this a big puzzle

Where the Une can represent infinity it might be base infinite

Of sorts also perhaps not sure?? You figure it out get back to me

I know nothing at this point and I am learning along with you here.

 

 

 

Philosophy based on theology and science  not science exactly

 

One does not exist in nature and perhaps zero should be considered a imaginary number also not real in the sense of our natural world. So we will eliminate 0 and 1 from any calculations

If we check even a atom is a multi objected item it has many parts therefore can not be seen as one even the smallest subatomic particle can be thought of as UNE or a cup of items unknown number starting with the first real number 2 the smallest subatomic particle can be seen as Uas2 or a unit of possible two or more items

It also has a inside and outside to any particle making it 4 at minimum

Or Uas4ofU=Uas2+2ofU

 both inside and outside represented here in Uas?ofU

 

So any single particle can be  and is probablity is made of smaller things we will find someday

 

 

One does not exist; it is UNE. A cup of items or atoms or vibes is all

une = infinity

the universe is UNE

God IS UNE

that cup of things is UNE

 

Uas 23456789 ofU

U23456789U

 

And 0 and 1 can be taught as unnatural numbers yet not to be used in abstract atomic math

vOId  v01d

Void 01 are this

Don’t exist void

 

 

So (1)U23456789U(0)

 

Would be our new number system of 12 measurements be  perhaps base 12 NO it would not since we do not use these number yet we might need them to calculate this math so sorta half included

By understanding all the 12 numbers we can decide to use the Atomic UNE's or the Unnatural numbers 1/0

Don’t tell the digital age that ones and zeros don’t exist

Does off exist if everything has energy even that unnoticed has energy inherent in it so its only a degree of OFF that exists total off is not found in nature since everything is a TURN ON in nature or has energy in it. All is a vibe at its base a series of small dots that create a vibe at the lowest levels of subatomic existance

 

 

These number can be taught and should be included for historical purposes

Zero and one are unnatural numbers

 

 

 

 

 

U as infinity equals U (alone)

 

 

 

UNEas 2 to infinity

ofUNE from infinity backwards from/to  2

 

Uas

ofU

 

Infinity maybe also be calculated  U+U=infinity or U

U=infinity or

Uas (infinity symbol)'

UasU=infinity proper

U+U=U as infinity

 

 

 

Perhaps we can change the word infinity to Unfinity

 

The first U is to know the infinity or universe within all things each UNE/ONE item is the universe within as atoms and subatomic water and other subatomic particles we can now label items as Uas6  (246) for example to represent the number of major items in hot water and tea leafs in a cup of tea.

 

The Universe WITHIN as a number

The infinity within

 

And the last U on the list after 9 is the universe without as UNE Infinity as UNE

The universe without and its math and infinity the two infinities within and without come true in abstract atomic math

 

Things that are within and without

Energy is both within and without

In the sun the energy is store but it is released outwards as light heat radiations

When light is middle of the void or air or the subatomic waters it is without its source

This is when you might use ofU as a calculation perhaps maybe

Where ofU is just whats short of infinity

And without

Time and other concepts that we think are real are possibly without

Love perhaps is a energy and without at times also

Emotions perhaps without also

Energy time emotions theory even is without

Concepts are without

Time relies on two physical bodies in motion but it’s a measure between them so is a concept more or less and is without mostly

 

 

 

 

Une as or Uas is 2 to infinity and ofU or ofUne is this side of infinity where U is infinity  so 2ofU is 2 short of infinity Uas2ofUne (or any number larger than 2)is the number after infinity where 2 of UNE is 2 before infinity

We can abstractly set infinity and do math computations backwards from it or beyond it either way. Beyond infinity is as this  2ofUUas2 or any number to infinity

 

 

UNE should start Uas or UNEas and end any numerical order in single digits as ofU or of Une . It should be taught as both UNE or one cup of somethings and at the end of any math scale, the end being Infinity at the end of all math. U plus U is U also really at times and sometimes more

2 is the first valid real number that exists as an actual number 2. Even the smallest subatomic particles we can find and identify can be thought of as 2 of something or une U a cup of items.

2 is the first real number UNE exists, but not as ONE ONE DOES NOT EXIST

it is imaginary only, not a real one

UNE U forever heretofore

MK-Donald

naldo ray head

U=2 the smallest particle can be seen as 2 or U

U=U same as above

U+U=U two lovers in love having a Union a tea bag plus a cup of water equals UNE CUP of tea

U+U=3 the family after the birth of a child

U+U=4 one UNE is 2 or more

U=2 or more to infinity  these can be expressed as Uas2 Uas3 Uas4 etc. to infinity

there is NO Uas1

U=infinity the universe and beyond is UNE

UNE never equals zero or 1  it is 2 or greater in essence

 

Zero also is in question if nothing really exists or not we use zeros to prop up the rest of the numbers when adding over single digits it has its use but lets replace that with UNE then something that represents at least 2 or more  so 500 would look like 5UU as a rule use UNE or U as and in place of the nonexistent zeros of the world

UUU might represent U00 for example which would be no less than 222 and perhaps more

 

100 through 221 will not exist in abstract math

It will be 99 or Uas99 then 222 or Uas222

100-221 will be gone no more

Likewise 1000 or 1 of any amount will not be seen it will be UUUU Unethousand

It will be UNEthousand and represent 2222

 

I am not sure but my abstract atomic math appears to be base 8 math

Ten is missing 2 numbers zero and one and it starts at 2 so U23456789U

Where U can be any number over 2

Base eight math is not unknown

Its just different that conventional math

Could it be base 7 math?
if you take 999 and minus 222 you get 777

I am unsure if its truly base 7 or 8 by standard defination its base 8

But if you eliminate the 1 or 0 all you have is 8 numbers but 9 the highest number and 2 the lowest number equal seven when deducted so I like to think its really base 7 due to how I calculate it with out 1 or 0

There are only 9 minus 2 is seven

Simple

There is no 10 in my math this is base 7

 

Never mind my questioning this but it is basically base 8 with 2 Unes of 2 to infinity and 2 from infinity what base that is is rather confusing here so I ponder it has 10 units of measure but it sure isnt base 10 so what is it?

Its like base 8 to infinity of sorts where infinity is Uas = 2 to infinity and/or ofU =2 from infinity

Yet not base ten I am sure

 

 

999 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2232

999 UUUU UUU3 UUU4 etc

3332-9999

333U 3333 3334 etc

 

Some samples of U

Uas22 (10) is a coin with its five sides each side granted 2points or 22 (10)

Uas4 for a ROCK which has a inside and a outside or Ux2=4 or Uas4 or as Uas2 if you count the inside and outside as the reasoning behind 2 being the minimal number.

Everything has a inside and outside therefore any item is at least 2 also

Perhaps 4 if inside is valued at 2 and outside same then Uas4 everything might start out as

However since inside is measure as Uas and outside as ofU then perhaps any object is uas2 and 2ofu both and together even

 

 

 

2ofU the edge of the universe or universes

6ofU is perhaps the better calculation for the edge of the 3 universes

 

 

Uas6 or Uas4 or Uas2 any of these might be seen as a number of universes

Uas2 at least for having a positive or negative universe

Uas4 granting that each of those 2 universes each will have 2 or more items in it

And Uas6 wondering where our pos/neg universes came from since nothing does not exist perhaps no zero then something was before our known universe also that you can not create anything from nothing and also that nothing is created (from nothing) or destroyed

Nothing or zero may not exist or does not according to this atomic math so there for Uas6 is more reasonable to understand that our universe came from something

So 3 real universes and calculated as Uas6 for the known universe in the simplest math other calculates can happen.

 

Uas72 hours in each day or uas72=one day in hours

For you can live in the past present and future in your mind there for each hour is times three. Or minute or anytime times three

Tx3

Time maybe represented as 72ofU also due to it being rather a measurement or concept

And without rather than within

A day maybe represented as 72ofU

Which is without and short of infinity somehow?

The first U and last U can be seen together as UU the last U starts where the first U ends

In other words infinity can be seen vastly different in ever object inifinty may exist and without every object infinity maybe closer than you think.

Visually its like U<>U first U is lessor and last U is greater of sorts

Lessor within greater without

A day could be written 72ofUUas72

Or other calculations that you may find in abstract math

If you must have Uas24 as time you may as long as no ones or zeros are ever used

 

 

 

The first Une is the object itself and what is inside

The last Une is what is immediately outside the object up to infiinty

2ofUUas2 or more is the way of presenting this in formula

 

 

 

 

Base t0 perhaps has 10 digits the last and first are equal one represents infinity and the other U is 2 or more to infinity

Base 9 perhaps I have nine digits

Or base 8 since we are missing 2 digits also in real numbers

Or base 7 which it feels like to me that it is..

It perhaps is base infinity where U is zillion of things in common day language

The base of this number system is infinity its perhaps base infinity

 

Your math computations on any of this may vary for example time as 72ofU is wrong (Une day equals or is Uas98/99 (add one in classical math to my formula so really a day equals Uas99) in our math) we have to determine 72 places into this type of math (98) to conclude the right answer which I did not do since really I have a math block from childhood with the only math I enjoyed or rather understood in simple terms was probablity.

But this is a philosophical model only not a science math a philos. Concept of a a type of new math is all

Warning I am NOT a mathematician I am a philosopher

Some things in this paper do not add up at times I know this

Do your own calculations for the simple examples

 

A Galton board which I have has 3500 tiny balls in it therefor my Galton board would be Uas3501 or Uas3502 perhaps depending I have not calculated 3502/3501 yet

In abstract atomic math yet I can imagine it might double or triple 3502/1 where as  Uas5UU or 522 is in classic math is 266 so therefore  3501 perhaps I think. Could also double or triple approximately  Not sure at this point I know nothing and am learning along with you here.

 

 

 

 

In a round about way this abstract atomic math cost the government over $50K

Yes I am rather public and privately funded if you must know as are lots of people

For explaination join the secret squirrel club

 

.don meek

Atommiek

A Tom Meek

Atomic

Donald K Meek

Naldo Ray Head

Raydon

 

This is dedicated to my sister Darlene Durfee who imprisoned me  in a mental institution for similar ideas- it was that one plus one equals three in biology  U+U=3 the very beginning of this idea and since I suffered much for the original question how is it that 1+1=3 which is more a question at the time I finally got around to resolving this to this point thanks Darlene

Greatness does come from adversity. Also if I dare say that genius come with hints of madness

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edits

8/12/22 revision 2

8/12/22 revision 3

8/12/22 revision 4

8/13/22 revision 2

8/13/22 revision 3

8/13/22 revision 4

8/13/22 revision 5

8/13/22 revision 6

8/13/22 revision 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<<abstractatomicmath.xlsx>>

abstractatomicmath.xlsx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

U+U=3  UNEs in the family after the birth of a child U=U=3 Unes or Uas6 divided by 2 is 3

Divided by 2 due to Uof6 is coming from 2 UNES divide by at least 2 since each individual UNE is 2 or more   finding the child as Uas2 themselves

Minus 4 for the 2 unes would be Uof2 and we have 3 UNEs as a result

Uas6 is the UNE family unit of 3 each unes

In a way we can see UNE a sort of one when 2 or more unes are present but each une still is 2 or more parts we just will and can know them as ONE UNE or Uas 2 plus

The concept of one is still important even in abstracted math but we never use it at any time for a function only to count the number of unes

One is a concept we must use at times even in abstracted math we must count the unes

2468 22 24 26 28 etc. we could wonder I think we count the unes in classical math convert that to abstract math and proceed

One is a concept avoid it in your calculations other than how many unes one has if you are adding unes then its more than 2 anyways in the results

Anyways I know nothing at this point and will learn along with you

Could it be possible we need only use even numbers 2 4 6 8?

Then what base math is this?
classic math is still important in abstract math to calculate how many UNES exist

Also from there we calculate the classic math number into abstracted base 8 numbers

Basically we can know UNE as ONE when counting  unes but knowing that this is conceptual and we need to really know each UNE as 2 or more

Actually this is a stump for me I don’t know the answer here

One is just a concept to count the unes. Since each une is really infinity if we found the smallest particle as one that would be our measure of infinity within

23456789 22

10 UNES is 22

Each une is 2 so we might wonder if we have Uas65 (44) (convert to AAM abstract atomic math)  here for our ten/22 unes

We must use 1 and zero at times

But convert to base 8 or abstracted math where one/zero  should never appear

If we only used even number for Uas? Then we have a different base

2468 base 4 math perhaps?

Hmmm

Interesting

I know noting here again I am learning

Figure this out yourself

If any calculate ends up as zero or one calculate it to 2 or -2 depending rounding up or down in this instance

1=2 in all cases except where its less that 1 and more than minus 2

Round down

0 to -1.99999999 equals minus 2

 

I not sure how this might work its up to you as perhaps a math person to refine this math and work out the bugs if possible

 

After all calculations you can divide that number by 2 to get a classical math number and convert that to abstract atomic math base 8 or ?? And you have a answer complete

The answer then expressed as perhaps U=any number not Uas but simple U=?

Or without the U just as number of what problem you seek number of unes or number of atoms or such???

Atoms=any number for example

UNE need not be in the answer I don’t think

Any number alone will work

Uas2 plus Uas 2 equals Uas 4 divided by 2 for each UNE is 2 in classical math or 2 in AAM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Abstract atomic math formula examples

Saturday, August 13, 2022

9:06 PM

A photon may contain 4 dots to create 3 vibes or vibrations 4x2=8

So 8 inside Uas8 and 3vibesx2=6 6ofU then 6+8=14 so a photon is Uas14ofU is the calculation for Une photon inside and outside. Or  Uas8+6ofU now 14=27/U7 in our new abstract math so the real end formula is UasU7/27ofU

 

 

 

Why 4 dots?

A photon of light is a minimum 3 vibrations of red blue and green

4 dusts or dots equal 3 vibrations

2 dots half a vibe

3 dots a vibe and a half

4 dots 3 vibes or vibrations

 

Why 3ofUx2=6ofU?

3 vibrations are produced by this dot that is outside it and when the photon hits the canvas its vibes produce all the colors and values

These vibes are energy and without if you recall or within and without

 

 

A cup with out contents is Uas2

And 2ofU we might wonder here if 2 extends to the next U or Uas4ofU

Its value outside is consider 2 also you might wonder why?

The very fine layer between air and a cup is 2 of some subatomic particle you might imagine

Even if its UNE subatomic particle away from air the surface of the cup this is why

And UNE is 2 or more

A hot cup of coffee radiate energy beyond the cup to a great degree that we might measure it in temperature as 70(degrees)ofU

Or any other temp. hot or cold

Or room temp take room temp add this number to the ofU of the empty cup and we have a calculation for the outside of the cup in radiant energy remember this is abstract math for such things as this to suggest a empty cup radiates is hard to understand

But it in fact has a vibe that radiate the room around you to your senses at least

Untill you sense it its just a vibe number is all and rather flat in a way being a wave of energy only. Or vibe

 

The secret to the universe is 22

UU or 22

UU represents two universes entangled and so close they touch the inner universe or infinity and the outer universe or infinity are just a U apart or this can bee seen as UUU or 222 also

Or is equated such

Uas2ofU

UasUofU

Which is infinity proper infinity touching

Where they connect or overlap even

 

 

To calculate things beyond the known universe which can be thought of as infinite or unfinite

Since everything in the known universe within is perhaps infinite then the known universe is also infinite but to calculate beyond this into other negative or grander universes from where we all came we might suggest a ofU2Uas a computation to start and go from there or also 2ofUas2 or any number greater.

 

This is how to represent the extended infinity

 

Remember this is abstract atomic math

We can set infinity just a UNE away from the next infinity.

Infinity is close at hand here not far away at the edge of the universe I say

 

 

Remember infinity is close at hand in the very air we breath the cup we drink from the food we eat infinity is in everything.

 

 

 

 

Time is odd

We live life psychologically in the past present and future granting any amount of time to each or all at once really intertwined

This is times multiplied by 3

Or Tx3

So a day 24x3=72=Uas99 a day=99ofU time without  as a concept or Uas99 time within our psychology. So a day is Uas99ofU even then also

Your computations may vary

 

 

While 2 is the first real number UNE may or may not exist as infinity as you might question if infinity exists?

Well in math infinity exists yet in nature its truly unsure

In my estimate if we had a universe within a universe within a universe times 1000000000

Would we not think of this a infinate in our small existance? How big doers infinity really need to be? If every subatomic particle the smallest of these were considered Uas2 and in those Uas2 were each 2 more then if we calculate a particle within a particle within a particle x 2 each we might see infinity starting I would suggest we add UNEfinite to the dictionary to adjust this idea where UNEfinity is not forever or endless ideologically but in a sort of practical sense where the universe or known universe is seen as UNEfinite

 

UNE is perhaps a  half truth whereas 2 is a real number UNE is a half number or half truth or has a chance of half existance since infinity is truly in question here. And remember zeros and ones do not exist at all but are necessary in classical math to calculate the abstract atomic math here

 

U+U=3  UNEs in the family after the birth of a child U=U=3 Unes or Uas6 divided by 2 is 3

Divided by 2 due to Uof6 is coming from 2 UNES divide by at least 2 since each individual UNE is 2 or more   finding the child as Uas2 themselves

Minus 4 for the 2 unes would be Uof2 and we have 3 UNEs as a result

Uas6 is the UNE family unit of 3 each unes

In a way we can see UNE a sort of one when 2 or more unes are present but each une still is 2 or more parts we just will and can know them as ONE UNE or Uas 2 plus

The concept of one is still important even in abstracted math but we never use it at any time for a function only to count the number of unes

One is a concept we must use at times even in abstracted math we must count the unes

2468 22 24 26 28 etc. we could wonder I think we count the unes in classical math convert that to abstract math and proceed

One is a concept avoid it in your calculations other than how many unes one has if you are adding unes then its more than 2 anyways in the results

Anyways I know nothing at this point and will learn along with you

Could it be possible we need only use even numbers 2 4 6 8?

Then what base math is this?
classic math is still important in abstract math to calculate how many UNES exist

Also from there we calculate the classic math number into abstracted base 8 numbers

Basically we can know UNE as ONE when counting  unes but knowing that this is conceptual and we need to really know each UNE as 2 or more

Actually this is a stump for me I don’t know the answer here

One is just a concept to count the unes. Since each une is really infinity if we found the smallest particle as one that would be our measure of infinity within

23456789 22

10 UNES is 22

Each une is 2 so we might wonder if we have Uas65 (44) (convert to AAM abstract atomic math)  here for our ten/22 unes

We must use 1 and zero at times

But convert to base 8 or abstracted math where one/zero  should never appear

If we only used even number for Uas? Then we have a different base

2468 base 4 math perhaps?

Hmmm

Interesting

I know noting here again I am learning

Figure this out yourself

If any calculate ends up as zero or one calculate it to 2 or -2 depending rounding up or down in this instance

1=2 in all cases except where its less that 1 and more than minus 2

Round down

0 to -1.99999999 equals minus 2

 

I not sure how this might work its up to you as perhaps a math person to refine this math and work out the bugs if possible

 

After all calculations you can divide that number by 2 to get a classical math number and convert that to abstract atomic math base 8 or ?? And you have a answer complete

The answer then expressed as perhaps U=any number not Uas but simple U=?

Or without the U just as number of what problem you seek number of unes or number of atoms or such???

Atoms=any number for example

UNE need not be in the answer I don’t think

Any number alone will work

Uas2 plus Uas 2 equals Uas 4 divided by 2 for each UNE is 2 in classical math or 2 in AAM

 

 

 

 

The Magician 19

The Philosophical Model

 

.don meek

Donald k meek

Keemo nod

Bon bon

Don don

Naldo ray head

MK-donald

Noddy boy

 

 

Edit

8/14/22 revision 2

8/20/22 revision Uas2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Une not One an philosophical model

Wednesday, August 10, 2022

1:06 PM

Abstract atomic  math 101

A probable base eight system with 2 Une"s which are 2 to infinity  and 2 from infinity

I say probable due to the unknown if you can figure what base this is please let me know.

The infinite inside and outside makes this a big puzzle

Where the Une can represent infinity it might be base infinite

Of sorts also perhaps not sure?? You figure it out get back to me

I know nothing at this point and I am learning along with you here.

 

 

 

Philosophy based on theology and science  not science exactly

 

One does not exist in nature and perhaps zero should be considered a imaginary number also not real in the sense of our natural world. So we will eliminate 0 and 1 from any calculations

If we check even a atom is a multi objected item it has many parts therefore can not be seen as one even the smallest subatomic particle can be thought of as UNE or a cup of items unknown number starting with the first real number 2 the smallest subatomic particle can be seen as Uas2 or a unit of possible two or more items

It also has a inside and outside to any particle making it 4 at minimum

Or Uas4ofU=Uas2+2ofU

 both inside and outside represented here in Uas?ofU

 

So any single particle can be  and is probablity is made of smaller things we will find someday

 

 

One does not exist; it is UNE. A cup of items or atoms or vibes is all

une = infinity

the universe is UNE

God IS UNE

that cup of things is UNE

 

Uas 23456789 ofU

U23456789U

 

And 0 and 1 can be taught as unnatural numbers yet not to be used in abstract atomic math

vOId  v01d

Void 01 are this

Don’t exist void

 

 

So (1)U23456789U(0)

 

Would be our new number system of 12 measurements be  perhaps base 12 NO it would not since we do not use these number yet we might need them to calculate this math so sorta half included

By understanding all the 12 numbers we can decide to use the Atomic UNE's or the Unnatural numbers 1/0

Don’t tell the digital age that ones and zeros don’t exist

Does off exist if everything has energy even that unnoticed has energy inherent in it so its only a degree of OFF that exists total off is not found in nature since everything is a TURN ON in nature or has energy in it. All is a vibe at its base a series of small dots that create a vibe at the lowest levels of subatomic existance

 

 

These number can be taught and should be included for historical purposes

Zero and one are unnatural numbers

 

 

 

 

 

U as infinity equals U (alone)

 

 

 

UNEas 2 to infinity

ofUNE from infinity backwards from/to  2

 

Uas

ofU

 

Infinity maybe also be calculated  U+U=infinity or U

U=infinity or

Uas (infinity symbol)'

UasU=infinity proper

U+U=U as infinity

 

 

 

Perhaps we can change the word infinity to Unfinity

 

The first U is to know the infinity or universe within all things each UNE/ONE item is the universe within as atoms and subatomic water and other subatomic particles we can now label items as Uas6  (246) for example to represent the number of major items in hot water and tea leafs in a cup of tea.

 

The Universe WITHIN as a number

The infinity within

 

And the last U on the list after 9 is the universe without as UNE Infinity as UNE

The universe without and its math and infinity the two infinities within and without come true in abstract atomic math

 

Things that are within and without

Energy is both within and without

In the sun the energy is store but it is released outwards as light heat radiations

When light is middle of the void or air or the subatomic waters it is without its source

This is when you might use ofU as a calculation perhaps maybe

Where ofU is just whats short of infinity

And without

Time and other concepts that we think are real are possibly without

Love perhaps is a energy and without at times also

Emotions perhaps without also

Energy time emotions theory even is without

Concepts are without

Time relies on two physical bodies in motion but it’s a measure between them so is a concept more or less and is without mostly

 

 

 

 

Une as or Uas is 2 to infinity and ofU or ofUne is this side of infinity where U is infinity  so 2ofU is 2 short of infinity Uas2ofUne (or any number larger than 2)is the number after infinity where 2 of UNE is 2 before infinity

We can abstractly set infinity and do math computations backwards from it or beyond it either way. Beyond infinity is as this  2ofUUas2 or any number to infinity

 

 

UNE should start Uas or UNEas and end any numerical order in single digits as ofU or of Une . It should be taught as both UNE or one cup of somethings and at the end of any math scale, the end being Infinity at the end of all math. U plus U is U also really at times and sometimes more

2 is the first valid real number that exists as an actual number 2. Even the smallest subatomic particles we can find and identify can be thought of as 2 of something or une U a cup of items.

2 is the first real number UNE exists, but not as ONE ONE DOES NOT EXIST

it is imaginary only, not a real one

UNE U forever heretofore

MK-Donald

naldo ray head

U=2 the smallest particle can be seen as 2 or U

U=U same as above

U+U=U two lovers in love having a Union a tea bag plus a cup of water equals UNE CUP of tea

U+U=3  UNEs in the family after the birth of a child U=U=3 Unes or Uas6 divided by 2 is 3

Divided by 2 due to Uof6 is coming from 2 UNES divide by at least 2 since each individual UNE is 2 or more   finding the child as Uas2 themselves

Minus 4 for the 2 unes would be Uof2 and we have 3 UNEs as a result

Uas6 is the UNE family unit of 3 each unes

In a way we can see UNE a sort of one when 2 or more unes are present but each une still is 2 or more parts we just will and can know them as ONE UNE or Uas 2 plus

The concept of one is still important even in abstracted math but we never use it at any time for a function only to count the number of unes

One is a concept we must use at times even in abstracted math we must count the unes

2468 22 24 26 28 etc. we could wonder I think we count the unes in classical math convert that to abstract math and proceed

One is a concept avoid it in your calculations other than how many unes one has if you are adding unes then its more than 2 anyways in the results

Anyways I know nothing at this point and will learn along with you

Could it be possible we need only use even numbers 2 4 6 8?

Then what base math is this?
classic math is still important in abstract math to calculate how many UNES exist

Also from there we calculate the classic math number into abstracted base 8 numbers

Basically we can know UNE as ONE when counting  unes but knowing that this is conceptual and we need to really know each UNE as 2 or more

Actually this is a stump for me I don’t know the answer here

One is just a concept to count the unes. Since each une is really infinity if we found the smallest particle as one that would be our measure of infinity within

23456789 22

10 UNES is 22

Each une is 2 so we might wonder if we have Uas65 (44) (convert to AAM abstract atomic math)  here for our ten/22 unes

We must use 1 and zero at times

But convert to base 8 or abstracted math where one/zero  should never appear

If we only used even number for Uas? Then we have a different base

2468 base 4 math perhaps?

Hmmm

Interesting

I know noting here again I am learning

Figure this out yourself

If any calculate ends up as zero or one calculate it to 2 or -2 depending rounding up or down in this instance

1=2 in all cases except where its less that 1 and more than minus 2

Round down

0 to -1.99999999 equals minus 2

 

I not sure how this might work its up to you as perhaps a math person to refine this math and work out the bugs if possible

 

After all calculations you can divide that number by 2 to get a classical math number and convert that to abstract atomic math base 8 or ?? And you have a answer complete

The answer then expressed as perhaps U=any number not Uas but simple U=?

Or without the U just as number of what problem you seek number of unes or number of atoms or such???

Atoms=any number for example

UNE need not be in the answer I don’t think

Any number alone will work

Uas2 plus Uas 2 equals Uas 4 divided by 2 for each UNE is 2 in classical math or 2 in AAM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U+U=4 one UNE is 2 or more

U=2 or more to infinity  these can be expressed as Uas2 Uas3 Uas4 etc. to infinity

there is NO Uas1

U=infinity the universe and beyond is UNE

UNE never equals zero or 1  it is 2 or greater in essence

 

Zero also is in question if nothing really exists or not we use zeros to prop up the rest of the numbers when adding over single digits it has its use but lets replace that with UNE then something that represents at least 2 or more  so 500 would look like 5UU as a rule use UNE or U as and in place of the nonexistent zeros of the world

UUU might represent U00 for example which would be no less than 222 and perhaps more

 

100 through 221 will not exist in abstract math

It will be 99 or Uas99 then 222 or Uas222

100-221 will be gone no more

Likewise 1000 or 1 of any amount will not be seen it will be UUUU Unethousand

It will be UNEthousand and represent 2222

 

I am not sure but my abstract atomic math appears to be base 8 math

Ten is missing 2 numbers zero and one and it starts at 2 so U23456789U

Where U can be any number over 2

Base eight math is not unknown

Its just different that conventional math

Could it be base 7 math?
if you take 999 and minus 222 you get 777

I am unsure if its truly base 7 or 8 by standard defination its base 8

But if you eliminate the 1 or 0 all you have is 8 numbers but 9 the highest number and 2 the lowest number equal seven when deducted so I like to think its really base 7 due to how I calculate it with out 1 or 0

There are only 9 minus 2 is seven

Simple

There is no 10 in my math this is base 7

 

Never mind my questioning this but it is basically base 8 with 2 Unes of 2 to infinity and 2 from infinity what base that is is rather confusing here so I ponder it has 10 units of measure but it sure isnt base 10 so what is it?

Its like base 8 to infinity of sorts where infinity is Uas = 2 to infinity and/or ofU =2 from infinity

Yet not base ten I am sure

 

 

999 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2232

999 UUUU UUU3 UUU4 etc

3332-9999

333U 3333 3334 etc

 

Some samples of U

Uas22 (10) is a coin with its five sides each side granted 2points or 22 (10)

Uas4 for a ROCK which has a inside and a outside or Ux2=4 or Uas4 or as Uas2 if you count the inside and outside as the reasoning behind 2 being the minimal number.

Everything has a inside and outside therefore any item is at least 2 also

Perhaps 4 if inside is valued at 2 and outside same then Uas4 everything might start out as

However since inside is measure as Uas and outside as ofU then perhaps any object is uas2 and 2ofu both and together even

 

 

 

2ofU the edge of the universe or universes

6ofU is perhaps the better calculation for the edge of the 3 universes

 

 

Uas6 or Uas4 or Uas2 any of these might be seen as a number of universes

Uas2 at least for having a positive or negative universe

Uas4 granting that each of those 2 universes each will have 2 or more items in it

And Uas6 wondering where our pos/neg universes came from since nothing does not exist perhaps no zero then something was before our known universe also that you can not create anything from nothing and also that nothing is created (from nothing) or destroyed

Nothing or zero may not exist or does not according to this atomic math so there for Uas6 is more reasonable to understand that our universe came from something

So 3 real universes and calculated as Uas6 for the known universe in the simplest math other calculates can happen.

 

Uas72 hours in each day or uas72=one day in hours

For you can live in the past present and future in your mind there for each hour is times three. Or minute or anytime times three

Tx3

Time maybe represented as 72ofU also due to it being rather a measurement or concept

And without rather than within

A day maybe represented as 72ofU

Which is without and short of infinity somehow?

The first U and last U can be seen together as UU the last U starts where the first U ends

In other words infinity can be seen vastly different in ever object inifinty may exist and without every object infinity maybe closer than you think.

Visually its like U<>U first U is lessor and last U is greater of sorts

Lessor within greater without

A day could be written 72ofUUas72

Or other calculations that you may find in abstract math

If you must have Uas24 as time you may as long as no ones or zeros are ever used

 

 

 

The first Une is the object itself and what is inside

The last Une is what is immediately outside the object up to infiinty

2ofUUas2 or more is the way of presenting this in formula

 

 

 

 

Base t0 perhaps has 10 digits the last and first are equal one represents infinity and the other U is 2 or more to infinity

Base 9 perhaps I have nine digits

Or base 8 since we are missing 2 digits also in real numbers

Or base 7 which it feels like to me that it is..

It perhaps is base infinity where U is zillion of things in common day language

The base of this number system is infinity its perhaps base infinity

 

Your math computations on any of this may vary for example time as 72ofU is wrong (Une day equals or is Uas98/99 (add one in classical math to my formula so really a day equals Uas99) in our math) we have to determine 72 places into this type of math (98) to conclude the right answer which I did not do since really I have a math block from childhood with the only math I enjoyed or rather understood in simple terms was probablity.

But this is a philosophical model only not a science math a philos. Concept of a a type of new math is all

Warning I am NOT a mathematician I am a philosopher

Some things in this paper do not add up at times I know this

Do your own calculations for the simple examples

 

A Galton board which I have has 3500 tiny balls in it therefor my Galton board would be Uas3501 or Uas3502 perhaps depending I have not calculated 3502/3501 yet

In abstract atomic math yet I can imagine it might double or triple 3502/1 where as  Uas5UU or 522 is in classic math is 266 so therefore  3501 perhaps I think. Could also double or triple approximately  Not sure at this point I know nothing and am learning along with you here.

 

 

 

 

In a round about way this abstract atomic math cost the government over $50K

Yes I am rather public and privately funded if you must know as are lots of people

For explaination join the secret squirrel club

 

.don meek

Atommiek

A Tom Meek

Atomic

Donald K Meek

Naldo Ray Head

Raydon

 

This is dedicated to my sister Darlene Durfee who imprisoned me  in a mental institution for similar ideas- it was that one plus one equals three in biology  U+U=3 the very beginning of this idea and since I suffered much for the original question how is it that 1+1=3 which is more a question at the time I finally got around to resolving this to this point thanks Darlene

Greatness does come from adversity. Also if I dare say that genius come with hints of madness

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edits

8/12/22 revision 2

8/12/22 revision 3

8/12/22 revision 4

8/13/22 revision 2

8/13/22 revision 3

8/13/22 revision 4

8/13/22 revision 5

8/13/22 revision 6

8/13/22 revision 7

8/20/22 revision Uof2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<<abstractatomicmath.xlsx>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

1=2

Sunday, August 21, 2022

12:23 PM

1 cell plus one cell division =2

In that cell is the division already so one contains at least 2

Both as a cell and as its divider  1=2

UNE is 2 or more to infinity

That cell contains billions of parts

It can be see bare minimum as 2 parts

One is two in all instances I feel

How ever we still use classic maths ONE or 1 to add up what is in a UNE

So a  ONE thing is seen as a UNE thing

One and une are closely related

That isnt ONE cup of tea that’s UNE cup of tea

Since it has a few major parts even

Abstract atomic math is not here to replace classical math

Its basically a base 8 system without 1 and 0 is all at the base it is

This is not unusual

Or weird

Or insane even

How ever to convince those so conservatively struck with ones and zeros

And they not being able to conceive without them is a harsh

If we do without one and zero for most all computations other than counting the number of things in a UNE perhaps we might need to add one I wonder

So 1 UNE= Uas2 to infinity

We do not say we have 2 unes perhaps

We say Uneas2

One une is 2 or more

So yes classical math we count how many things in a une but we might start at 2

So if I think man woman and child exist in each of us that would be 234 or Uas4

Sine we start at 2

Or man woman and child =3  3 things in a une with the une starting at 2 so 4 is the answer uas4

So lets recalculate the man woman child math

 

Man Uas4

Woman Uas4

Child Uas4

Uas4+uas4= uas8

Unas8/child uas4=uas2

Child uas2

Unas8/child uas2=Uas4

U+U=4

For classic math we minus one now that we added to the abstract math and get 3 as a answer again

U+U=3

3 is the classic math answer and 4 is the abstracted math answer

In classic math this would be

1+1=3 which seems crazy but is true in biology

 

.

Man woman child

Sunday, August 21, 2022

11:35 AM

Man= Uas3

Woman=Uas3

Child=Uas3

Man Uas3 + woman Uas3 =Uas6?

Uas6/Child Uof3=Uas2

Child=Uas2

Uof6/Uas2=3

U+U=3

 

Man and woman equals a family of 3 in classic math

man

 

Man woman and child =Uas3

Every human is man woman and child inside or 3

Uas3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Idiocracy would not relate Repression to Communism due to their years of training by the misdirecting repressors.
    .Raydon.

  • In my opinion, I am HALF right, and you are HALF wrong. Let's part ways. Each of us is taking our HALF LIFE in peace.
    Peach On Herb says Be Anointed with Kenah Bosum and seeking you will find HEAVEN is at hand.
×
×
  • Create New...